<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 692 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122813</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application, holding that there was no mistake apparent from the record warranting rectification. The Tribunal concluded that the view taken in the original order was a possible view, and the arguments and evidence presented by the assessee were considered. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessee was effectively seeking a review of the order under the guise of a rectification proceeding, which was not permissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:10:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 692 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122813</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application, holding that there was no mistake apparent from the record warranting rectification. The Tribunal concluded that the view taken in the original order was a possible view, and the arguments and evidence presented by the assessee were considered. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessee was effectively seeking a review of the order under the guise of a rectification proceeding, which was not permissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>