<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 684 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122805</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the applicability of Section 80-IA(9) in conjunction with Section 80HHC, directing the Assessing Officer to compute deductions independently to ensure they do not exceed 100% of eligible profits. The case was remanded for verification. The challenge to the validity of reassessment proceedings was rejected, and the levy of interest u/s 234D was disallowed for the assessment year 2003-04. The revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, and the assessee&#039;s cross-objections were dismissed, except for the interest levy issue, which was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:12:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 684 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122805</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the applicability of Section 80-IA(9) in conjunction with Section 80HHC, directing the Assessing Officer to compute deductions independently to ensure they do not exceed 100% of eligible profits. The case was remanded for verification. The challenge to the validity of reassessment proceedings was rejected, and the levy of interest u/s 234D was disallowed for the assessment year 2003-04. The revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, and the assessee&#039;s cross-objections were dismissed, except for the interest levy issue, which was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>