<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 577 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122776</link>
    <description>Interest under Rule 12 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 read with Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is attracted only where wrongly taken credit is actually utilised or otherwise causes deprivation of revenue. Section 11AB is compensatory in nature and applies to short payment, non-payment, or erroneous refund of duty, while Rule 12 extends recovery provisions to wrongly taken or wrongly utilised credit. On the stated facts, the excess credit was taken by mistake, never used for duty payment, and was reversed when pointed out; accordingly, the statutory basis for charging interest was absent and the interest demand was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:39:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 577 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122776</link>
      <description>Interest under Rule 12 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 read with Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is attracted only where wrongly taken credit is actually utilised or otherwise causes deprivation of revenue. Section 11AB is compensatory in nature and applies to short payment, non-payment, or erroneous refund of duty, while Rule 12 extends recovery provisions to wrongly taken or wrongly utilised credit. On the stated facts, the excess credit was taken by mistake, never used for duty payment, and was reversed when pointed out; accordingly, the statutory basis for charging interest was absent and the interest demand was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>