https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122774 Where import under the DFRC Scheme was already assessed, duty paid, and the competent authority had issued Release Advice, the Tribunal treated the only objection as a procedural one concerning prior permission for import from a non-specified station under Notification No. 48/2000-C.E. The absence of that permission did not, on these facts, justify insistence on pre-deposit at the interim stage. Pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived and stay was granted. en-us Wed, 29 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:38:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122774 Where import under the DFRC Scheme was already assessed, duty paid, and the competent authority had issued Release Advice, the Tribunal treated the only objection as a procedural one concerning prior permission for import from a non-specified station under Notification No. 48/2000-C.E. The absence of that permission did not, on these facts, justify insistence on pre-deposit at the interim stage. Pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived and stay was granted. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 29 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122774