<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 567 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122762</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand and penalties on the appellants for clandestine removal of goods based on discrepancies in records and private diaries maintained by the Production Manager. The Commissioner (Appeals) erred in setting aside the order, as the Tribunal found the private diaries to be reliable evidence, establishing the clandestine removal. The Tribunal reinstated the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the Revenue and dismissing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 13:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 567 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122762</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand and penalties on the appellants for clandestine removal of goods based on discrepancies in records and private diaries maintained by the Production Manager. The Commissioner (Appeals) erred in setting aside the order, as the Tribunal found the private diaries to be reliable evidence, establishing the clandestine removal. The Tribunal reinstated the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the Revenue and dismissing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>