<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 566 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122760</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai rejected refund claims on excise duty for PCC poles due to unjust enrichment. The duty passed on to electricity consumers resulted in the rejection of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 566 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122760</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai rejected refund claims on excise duty for PCC poles due to unjust enrichment. The duty passed on to electricity consumers resulted in the rejection of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>