<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 560 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122752</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on inputs and capital goods used by a job worker in goods cleared to the principal manufacturer without payment of duty was held admissible, because such goods were not treated as exempted or nil-rated goods for denying credit and duty was ultimately discharged at the principal manufacturer&#039;s stage. The denial of credit on that issue was set aside. Credit taken on inputs not received in the factory was also examined on admitted non-receipt and prior reversal by the assessee; on those facts, the denial was sustained. The assessee received partial relief, succeeding on the job-work credit dispute but failing on the separate claim for non-received inputs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:59:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 560 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122752</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on inputs and capital goods used by a job worker in goods cleared to the principal manufacturer without payment of duty was held admissible, because such goods were not treated as exempted or nil-rated goods for denying credit and duty was ultimately discharged at the principal manufacturer&#039;s stage. The denial of credit on that issue was set aside. Credit taken on inputs not received in the factory was also examined on admitted non-receipt and prior reversal by the assessee; on those facts, the denial was sustained. The assessee received partial relief, succeeding on the job-work credit dispute but failing on the separate claim for non-received inputs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>