<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 553 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122745</link>
    <description>The Settlement Commission allowed the case to proceed under Section 32 F(1) of the Central Excise Act, settling the duty liability at Rs. 3,34,537. The applicant was granted immunities from penalty and prosecution under Section 32K(1) of the Act due to prompt payment of duty and cooperation. The settlement terms included provisions to void the order if obtained through fraud or misrepresentation of facts under Section 32F(9) of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:34:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 553 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122745</link>
      <description>The Settlement Commission allowed the case to proceed under Section 32 F(1) of the Central Excise Act, settling the duty liability at Rs. 3,34,537. The applicant was granted immunities from penalty and prosecution under Section 32K(1) of the Act due to prompt payment of duty and cooperation. The settlement terms included provisions to void the order if obtained through fraud or misrepresentation of facts under Section 32F(9) of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>