<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 552 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122744</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the misdeclaration of goods in terms of quality and valuation. The appellant successfully argued that the goods were from recycled material and not of prime quality as alleged by the Revenue. The Tribunal found the value enhancement and misdeclaration claims unsustainable due to lack of evidence provided by the Revenue, ultimately setting aside the impugned orders and allowing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:27:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 552 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122744</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the misdeclaration of goods in terms of quality and valuation. The appellant successfully argued that the goods were from recycled material and not of prime quality as alleged by the Revenue. The Tribunal found the value enhancement and misdeclaration claims unsustainable due to lack of evidence provided by the Revenue, ultimately setting aside the impugned orders and allowing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>