https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122722 The company's appeal was dismissed because it did not comply with the statutory pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, and counsel confirmed that no deposit had been made. The Tribunal also held that the conditional waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery granted to the company's functionaries could not survive once the principal appellant failed to comply with the condition on which that relief depended. Their appeals were therefore delinked and posted separately for mention, rather than being heard on the merits at that stage. en-us Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:24:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122722 The company's appeal was dismissed because it did not comply with the statutory pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, and counsel confirmed that no deposit had been made. The Tribunal also held that the conditional waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery granted to the company's functionaries could not survive once the principal appellant failed to comply with the condition on which that relief depended. Their appeals were therefore delinked and posted separately for mention, rather than being heard on the merits at that stage. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122722