<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 528 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122720</link>
    <description>Packaged commodities marked for exclusive use as raw material by the printing and publishing industry qualified for the rule 34(a) exemption from MRP-based valuation before the prospective amendment to rule 2A took effect on 13-1-2007. The later insertion of the requirement of direct purchase by the industrial consumer from the manufacturer operated only prospectively and did not govern the earlier period. Goods routed through a depot or dealers were therefore not automatically liable to valuation under section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and were assessable under section 4 on transaction value instead. The analysis also noted that there is no estoppel in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 13:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 528 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122720</link>
      <description>Packaged commodities marked for exclusive use as raw material by the printing and publishing industry qualified for the rule 34(a) exemption from MRP-based valuation before the prospective amendment to rule 2A took effect on 13-1-2007. The later insertion of the requirement of direct purchase by the industrial consumer from the manufacturer operated only prospectively and did not govern the earlier period. Goods routed through a depot or dealers were therefore not automatically liable to valuation under section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and were assessable under section 4 on transaction value instead. The analysis also noted that there is no estoppel in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>