<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 516 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122708</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the lower authority&#039;s decision to grant interest for delays exceeding three months from the dates of the initial rebate claims. The judgment clarified the interpretation of interest payment for delayed claims, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument and supporting the respondents&#039; position based on established legal principles and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:42:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 516 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122708</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the lower authority&#039;s decision to grant interest for delays exceeding three months from the dates of the initial rebate claims. The judgment clarified the interpretation of interest payment for delayed claims, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument and supporting the respondents&#039; position based on established legal principles and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>