https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122706 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the pharmaceutical manufacturing company appellants, ruling that they had the right to relinquish title to goods even after the bond period expired under Section 68 of the Customs Act. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the authorities' orders and emphasized that no clearance order for home consumption was issued. As a result, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appellants prevailed in their case regarding duty liability for abandoned goods after the bond period expiry. en-us Tue, 31 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:37:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122706 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the pharmaceutical manufacturing company appellants, ruling that they had the right to relinquish title to goods even after the bond period expired under Section 68 of the Customs Act. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the authorities' orders and emphasized that no clearance order for home consumption was issued. As a result, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appellants prevailed in their case regarding duty liability for abandoned goods after the bond period expiry. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 31 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122706