<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 525 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122694</link>
    <description>A refund claim is not barred by unjust enrichment where the assessee substantiates, through books of account, invoices and a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate, that excess duty was not passed on to customers. Mere doubt about the certificate is insufficient when the evidence addresses the passing-on issue and satisfies the applicable precedent. The rejection of the refund claim was therefore not justified, and the refund was payable to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:38:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 525 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122694</link>
      <description>A refund claim is not barred by unjust enrichment where the assessee substantiates, through books of account, invoices and a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate, that excess duty was not passed on to customers. Mere doubt about the certificate is insufficient when the evidence addresses the passing-on issue and satisfies the applicable precedent. The rejection of the refund claim was therefore not justified, and the refund was payable to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>