<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 519 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122684</link>
    <description>Goods liable only to additional duty under the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 cannot be confiscated, and no penalty can be imposed merely for non-payment of that duty. On that basis, confiscation of canvas cloth and tarpaulin cloth was set aside. Although tarpaulin confiscation was undisputed, redemption fine and penalty required proportionality to the duty liability and relevant mitigating circumstances, including export of the goods. The redemption fine and corresponding penalty were therefore reduced. Substantial relief followed on the principal confiscation issues, while tarpaulin confiscation remained subject to reduced monetary consequences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:11:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 519 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122684</link>
      <description>Goods liable only to additional duty under the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 cannot be confiscated, and no penalty can be imposed merely for non-payment of that duty. On that basis, confiscation of canvas cloth and tarpaulin cloth was set aside. Although tarpaulin confiscation was undisputed, redemption fine and penalty required proportionality to the duty liability and relevant mitigating circumstances, including export of the goods. The redemption fine and corresponding penalty were therefore reduced. Substantial relief followed on the principal confiscation issues, while tarpaulin confiscation remained subject to reduced monetary consequences.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>