<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 667 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122681</link>
    <description>The ITAT held that the penalty under section 271A was not justified as the assessee maintained proper books of account in compliance with section 44AA. The AO&#039;s requirement to follow &quot;Accounting Standard-7&quot; was found to be unsupported by statutory provisions. Consequently, the penalty of Rs. 25,000 was quashed, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:00:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 667 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122681</link>
      <description>The ITAT held that the penalty under section 271A was not justified as the assessee maintained proper books of account in compliance with section 44AA. The AO&#039;s requirement to follow &quot;Accounting Standard-7&quot; was found to be unsupported by statutory provisions. Consequently, the penalty of Rs. 25,000 was quashed, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>