<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 512 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122673</link>
    <description>CESTAT, Kolkata held that cutting and slitting of HR/CR coils into sheets does not amount to manufacture; therefore the appellants are not manufacturers and not liable to pay Excise duty under Section 11D. As the appellants had paid more duty than the credit taken, the impugned demand in respect of the credit is unsustainable. The demand under Section 11D could not be raised against the appellants and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 12:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 512 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122673</link>
      <description>CESTAT, Kolkata held that cutting and slitting of HR/CR coils into sheets does not amount to manufacture; therefore the appellants are not manufacturers and not liable to pay Excise duty under Section 11D. As the appellants had paid more duty than the credit taken, the impugned demand in respect of the credit is unsustainable. The demand under Section 11D could not be raised against the appellants and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>