<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 658 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122663</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete the Rs. 30 lakhs commission disallowance, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. It was determined that the commission paid to the Directors was justified, commercially expedient, and did not contravene sections 36(1)(ii) or 37(1) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of assessing commercial expediency from the assessee&#039;s perspective and upheld that the commission payments were not for extra-commercial purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2023 14:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 658 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122663</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete the Rs. 30 lakhs commission disallowance, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. It was determined that the commission paid to the Directors was justified, commercially expedient, and did not contravene sections 36(1)(ii) or 37(1) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of assessing commercial expediency from the assessee&#039;s perspective and upheld that the commission payments were not for extra-commercial purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>