<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 499 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122650</link>
    <description>Huge storage tanks fabricated and erected stage by stage at site were treated as immovable after completion because they could not be physically moved and sold without dismantling. Applying the Board&#039;s circular on site-erected tanks, the materials were held not to be excisable goods, so Central Excise duty was not payable. The demand and consequential penalty were therefore set aside, and the assessee&#039;s appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:53:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 499 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122650</link>
      <description>Huge storage tanks fabricated and erected stage by stage at site were treated as immovable after completion because they could not be physically moved and sold without dismantling. Applying the Board&#039;s circular on site-erected tanks, the materials were held not to be excisable goods, so Central Excise duty was not payable. The demand and consequential penalty were therefore set aside, and the assessee&#039;s appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>