<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 497 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122647</link>
    <description>A limitation plea may be raised for the first time in second appeal where it is a pure question of law, and the Tribunal may entertain it. A duty demand based on shortage of excisable goods was time-barred because the notice did not invoke the extended period or allege suppression, misstatement, or fraud as required for recovery under the excise law. A penalty could still be imposed for admitted shortage and stock-record irregularity, but only up to the cap fixed by the applicable stock-verification rule, so the penalty was restricted to the statutory maximum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:27:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 497 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122647</link>
      <description>A limitation plea may be raised for the first time in second appeal where it is a pure question of law, and the Tribunal may entertain it. A duty demand based on shortage of excisable goods was time-barred because the notice did not invoke the extended period or allege suppression, misstatement, or fraud as required for recovery under the excise law. A penalty could still be imposed for admitted shortage and stock-record irregularity, but only up to the cap fixed by the applicable stock-verification rule, so the penalty was restricted to the statutory maximum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>