<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 490 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122635</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the High Court&#039;s ruling that the limitation for refund application starts from the discovery of mutual mistake, not the date of credit reversal. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision regarding the refund claim and Section 11B provisions, rejecting the revenue&#039;s appeals and affirming the order-in-appeal in favor of the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:35:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 490 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122635</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the High Court&#039;s ruling that the limitation for refund application starts from the discovery of mutual mistake, not the date of credit reversal. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision regarding the refund claim and Section 11B provisions, rejecting the revenue&#039;s appeals and affirming the order-in-appeal in favor of the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>