<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 453 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122626</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the absolute confiscation of the car and imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,000 on the appellant for facilitating illegal importation by lending his passport and making false declarations. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding ownership, notice, and procedural fairness were rejected due to his admission of not having a legitimate connection to the car and the absence of a valid claim under the relevant legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:57:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 453 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122626</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the absolute confiscation of the car and imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,000 on the appellant for facilitating illegal importation by lending his passport and making false declarations. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding ownership, notice, and procedural fairness were rejected due to his admission of not having a legitimate connection to the car and the absence of a valid claim under the relevant legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>