https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122608 Clearance from the Committee on Disputes covered only the penalty aspect, so the challenge to the duty demand fell outside the authorised scope and was held not maintainable. Penalty was then examined on the merits and was deleted because the dispute was revenue neutral under the Cenvat regime and the Department was aware of the practice of sending goods to job workers for minor work before despatch to customers. The result was dismissal of the duty-demand challenge and success for the assessee on penalty. en-us Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:49:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122608 Clearance from the Committee on Disputes covered only the penalty aspect, so the challenge to the duty demand fell outside the authorised scope and was held not maintainable. Penalty was then examined on the merits and was deleted because the dispute was revenue neutral under the Cenvat regime and the Department was aware of the practice of sending goods to job workers for minor work before despatch to customers. The result was dismissal of the duty-demand challenge and success for the assessee on penalty. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122608