<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 437 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122601</link>
    <description>Related-person valuation under Central Excise requires proof of mutuality of interest in each other&#039;s business, not merely common shareholding, common directors, control, or commercial dealings. Where two public limited companies remain distinct legal entities and the evidence does not show reciprocal business interest or extra-commercial consideration, they are not treated as related persons. In that situation, the seller&#039;s arm&#039;s length price cannot be discarded and the buyer&#039;s resale price cannot be substituted for assessable value. The text also notes that buyer-side commercial influence, bulk purchasing, branding, or expenditure on advertising and marketing does not by itself justify rejection of the transaction value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:17:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 437 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122601</link>
      <description>Related-person valuation under Central Excise requires proof of mutuality of interest in each other&#039;s business, not merely common shareholding, common directors, control, or commercial dealings. Where two public limited companies remain distinct legal entities and the evidence does not show reciprocal business interest or extra-commercial consideration, they are not treated as related persons. In that situation, the seller&#039;s arm&#039;s length price cannot be discarded and the buyer&#039;s resale price cannot be substituted for assessable value. The text also notes that buyer-side commercial influence, bulk purchasing, branding, or expenditure on advertising and marketing does not by itself justify rejection of the transaction value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>