<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 528 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122593</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the order, reducing the penalty imposed on the appellant from Rs. 46,369 to Rs. 5,000 under the Compounded Levy Scheme. The penalty amount was deemed appropriate considering the appellant&#039;s compliance with duty liability, albeit with some delay. The appeal was partly allowed, reflecting a fair outcome based on the circumstances and the Tribunal&#039;s consistent approach to penalty amounts for similar cases involving delays in duty discharge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 17:44:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 528 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122593</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the order, reducing the penalty imposed on the appellant from Rs. 46,369 to Rs. 5,000 under the Compounded Levy Scheme. The penalty amount was deemed appropriate considering the appellant&#039;s compliance with duty liability, albeit with some delay. The appeal was partly allowed, reflecting a fair outcome based on the circumstances and the Tribunal&#039;s consistent approach to penalty amounts for similar cases involving delays in duty discharge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>