https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122589 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the refund claim of Rs. 3,42,872 and interest to the appellants. The Tribunal found that the duty was paid under protest and not passed on to buyers, supported by evidence and citations. It held that the appellants had proven no unjust enrichment had occurred, referencing relevant case law. The judgment also acknowledged the appellants' entitlement to interest as per a previous ruling. en-us Mon, 21 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Aug 2012 17:33:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122589 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the refund claim of Rs. 3,42,872 and interest to the appellants. The Tribunal found that the duty was paid under protest and not passed on to buyers, supported by evidence and citations. It held that the appellants had proven no unjust enrichment had occurred, referencing relevant case law. The judgment also acknowledged the appellants' entitlement to interest as per a previous ruling. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 21 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122589