<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 519 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122584</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order and dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the applicability of Rule 16(2) when rejected goods are cleared as scrap, necessitating the payment of the Cenvat credit taken under Rule 16(1). The decision was based on a strict interpretation of the Central Excise Rules and the specific provisions outlined therein, ensuring compliance with the statutory requirements governing the availing and reversal of Cenvat credit in such circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 519 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122584</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order and dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the applicability of Rule 16(2) when rejected goods are cleared as scrap, necessitating the payment of the Cenvat credit taken under Rule 16(1). The decision was based on a strict interpretation of the Central Excise Rules and the specific provisions outlined therein, ensuring compliance with the statutory requirements governing the availing and reversal of Cenvat credit in such circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>