<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 515 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122580</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit of the entire penalty was waived where the appellant was described as a commission agent and the record did not show participation in evasion of central excise duty. Although records were recovered from his premises, no substantive finding linked him to the alleged clandestine clearances. On that basis, the stay petition was allowed and full waiver of pre-deposit was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 17:13:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 515 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122580</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit of the entire penalty was waived where the appellant was described as a commission agent and the record did not show participation in evasion of central excise duty. Although records were recovered from his premises, no substantive finding linked him to the alleged clandestine clearances. On that basis, the stay petition was allowed and full waiver of pre-deposit was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>