<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 565 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122571</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confirming penalties and confiscation of diamonds imposed on the appellant company. The allegations of manufacturing cut and polished diamonds were found to lack evidence, with discrepancies noted in the importation of rough diamonds for unauthorized manufacturing. The penalties were overturned as the case was deemed to hinge on incorrect grounds. The matter of returning the confiscated diamonds to the rightful owner was left to the authority for resolution in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:45:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 565 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122571</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confirming penalties and confiscation of diamonds imposed on the appellant company. The allegations of manufacturing cut and polished diamonds were found to lack evidence, with discrepancies noted in the importation of rough diamonds for unauthorized manufacturing. The penalties were overturned as the case was deemed to hinge on incorrect grounds. The matter of returning the confiscated diamonds to the rightful owner was left to the authority for resolution in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>