<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 564 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122570</link>
    <description>Modvat credit could not be denied merely because the supplying dealers were registered after the cut-off date where the invoices and goods otherwise satisfied the governing circulars. Circular No. 76/94 accepted documents issued by a registered dealer before registration if the dealer was otherwise eligible under earlier circulars, and the invoices here conformed to Circular No. 15/94 and Circular No. 21/94. With no adverse finding against the dealers and no showing that the goods had escaped duty, refusal of credit on a technical ground would defeat the object of the scheme. The assessee was therefore entitled to the credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:42:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 564 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122570</link>
      <description>Modvat credit could not be denied merely because the supplying dealers were registered after the cut-off date where the invoices and goods otherwise satisfied the governing circulars. Circular No. 76/94 accepted documents issued by a registered dealer before registration if the dealer was otherwise eligible under earlier circulars, and the invoices here conformed to Circular No. 15/94 and Circular No. 21/94. With no adverse finding against the dealers and no showing that the goods had escaped duty, refusal of credit on a technical ground would defeat the object of the scheme. The assessee was therefore entitled to the credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>