<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 561 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122567</link>
    <description>Determination of annual capacity of production under the excise framework is a quasi-judicial exercise and must comply with natural justice. Where the assessee contends that the furnace was not in operation and seeks consideration of that representation, the authority must afford a reasonable opportunity of hearing before fixing capacity. In the absence of any indication that such hearing was granted, the capacity determination was invalid. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh determination after giving the assessee a proper opportunity to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:34:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 561 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122567</link>
      <description>Determination of annual capacity of production under the excise framework is a quasi-judicial exercise and must comply with natural justice. Where the assessee contends that the furnace was not in operation and seeks consideration of that representation, the authority must afford a reasonable opportunity of hearing before fixing capacity. In the absence of any indication that such hearing was granted, the capacity determination was invalid. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh determination after giving the assessee a proper opportunity to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>