<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 667 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122559</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the claimed depreciation on the assets of the closed Surat division. The Tribunal interpreted the term &quot;used&quot; in a broader sense under the block system, emphasizing that assets in the block remain eligible for depreciation even if not actively used. The closure of the Surat division did not disqualify the assets from depreciation as they were part of the block used for business purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2023 17:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 667 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122559</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the claimed depreciation on the assets of the closed Surat division. The Tribunal interpreted the term &quot;used&quot; in a broader sense under the block system, emphasizing that assets in the block remain eligible for depreciation even if not actively used. The closure of the Surat division did not disqualify the assets from depreciation as they were part of the block used for business purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>