<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 665 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122556</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, affirming the project completion method for income recognition over the percentage completion method. The Tribunal emphasized that developers can only recognize profit upon project completion and sale, rejecting the Assessing Officer&#039;s change in method. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal on net profit estimation as infructuous, given the decision on the primary issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2023 10:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 665 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122556</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, affirming the project completion method for income recognition over the percentage completion method. The Tribunal emphasized that developers can only recognize profit upon project completion and sale, rejecting the Assessing Officer&#039;s change in method. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal on net profit estimation as infructuous, given the decision on the primary issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>