<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 614 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122540</link>
    <description>Brass scrap cleared for job work could not be valued on the basis of higher figures reflected in balance sheets or by comparison with another manufacturer&#039;s scrap values, because the transactions were not sales, no extra consideration flowed back, and the converted goods were returned on duty-paid basis. The duty demand was therefore unsustainable on merits. The extended period of limitation also could not be invoked, as the clearances were disclosed in invoices, statutory records and RT-12 returns, the department had access through audit, and the arrangement was revenue neutral. Penalties were likewise unsustainable, and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:48:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 614 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122540</link>
      <description>Brass scrap cleared for job work could not be valued on the basis of higher figures reflected in balance sheets or by comparison with another manufacturer&#039;s scrap values, because the transactions were not sales, no extra consideration flowed back, and the converted goods were returned on duty-paid basis. The duty demand was therefore unsustainable on merits. The extended period of limitation also could not be invoked, as the clearances were disclosed in invoices, statutory records and RT-12 returns, the department had access through audit, and the arrangement was revenue neutral. Penalties were likewise unsustainable, and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>