https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122538 The Tribunal upheld the penalty under Rule 27 but reduced it to Rs. 10,000, setting aside the penalty under Section 11AC due to the immediate duty payment upon detection of shortages and the lack of evidence of wilful removal. The appeal was rejected based on the facts and circumstances of the case. en-us Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:46:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122538 The Tribunal upheld the penalty under Rule 27 but reduced it to Rs. 10,000, setting aside the penalty under Section 11AC due to the immediate duty payment upon detection of shortages and the lack of evidence of wilful removal. The appeal was rejected based on the facts and circumstances of the case. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122538