<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 550 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122523</link>
    <description>In a duty demand arising from alleged clandestine removals, duty computation had to account for Modvat credit on duty-paid inputs and the assessable value had to be worked on a cum-duty basis. The Tribunal noted that the evidence of duty-paid receipt of compressors was not properly considered, and applied the principle that credit cannot be denied merely for non-compliance with Modvat procedure. On that basis, the available credit exceeded the duty confirmed, leaving no net duty liability and rendering the demand and connected penalties unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:16:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 550 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122523</link>
      <description>In a duty demand arising from alleged clandestine removals, duty computation had to account for Modvat credit on duty-paid inputs and the assessable value had to be worked on a cum-duty basis. The Tribunal noted that the evidence of duty-paid receipt of compressors was not properly considered, and applied the principle that credit cannot be denied merely for non-compliance with Modvat procedure. On that basis, the available credit exceeded the duty confirmed, leaving no net duty liability and rendering the demand and connected penalties unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>