https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122515 Capital goods credit was disputed on the ground that transfer of the factory on lease amounted to deemed removal of the capital goods under Rule 57U of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The tribunal also considered whether recovery should be stayed pending appeal. It granted waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery, and because of conflicting views on the issue, referred the appeal to a Division Bench for further consideration. en-us Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122515 Capital goods credit was disputed on the ground that transfer of the factory on lease amounted to deemed removal of the capital goods under Rule 57U of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The tribunal also considered whether recovery should be stayed pending appeal. It granted waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery, and because of conflicting views on the issue, referred the appeal to a Division Bench for further consideration. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122515