https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122510 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal seeking a refund of Rs. 1,30,807, which had been adjusted against a different pending demand. The Tribunal held that the adjustment was not legally sustainable as the appellant had deposited the amount as a pre-deposit against a separate order. The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities' decision and granted the appeal with consequential relief, emphasizing that the adjustment of the refund against another case was unjustified. en-us Wed, 27 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122510 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal seeking a refund of Rs. 1,30,807, which had been adjusted against a different pending demand. The Tribunal held that the adjustment was not legally sustainable as the appellant had deposited the amount as a pre-deposit against a separate order. The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities' decision and granted the appeal with consequential relief, emphasizing that the adjustment of the refund against another case was unjustified. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 27 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122510