<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 535 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122502</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the appeal regarding the export of goods without payment of duty and non-furnishing of proof of export. The Tribunal determined that the issue did not fall within its purview and directed the appeal to be presented before the appropriate forum with jurisdiction. The time spent before the Tribunal was saved by limitation due to the appellants&#039; belief in the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:42:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 535 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122502</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the appeal regarding the export of goods without payment of duty and non-furnishing of proof of export. The Tribunal determined that the issue did not fall within its purview and directed the appeal to be presented before the appropriate forum with jurisdiction. The time spent before the Tribunal was saved by limitation due to the appellants&#039; belief in the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>