<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 372 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122497</link>
    <description>Where an assessee reversed 8% Cenvat credit on exempted clearances, credit taken on dutiable clearances was treated as sustainable. The Tribunal followed its earlier final order in the assessee&#039;s own case and held that non-maintenance of separate accounts for common inputs did not, by itself, justify denial of credit on dutiable goods. On that basis, the duty demand was held unsustainable and relief was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:24:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 372 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122497</link>
      <description>Where an assessee reversed 8% Cenvat credit on exempted clearances, credit taken on dutiable clearances was treated as sustainable. The Tribunal followed its earlier final order in the assessee&#039;s own case and held that non-maintenance of separate accounts for common inputs did not, by itself, justify denial of credit on dutiable goods. On that basis, the duty demand was held unsustainable and relief was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>