<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 890 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122492</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, quashing the block assessment order due to the invalidity of the notice served beyond the prescribed period under section 143(2). The Tribunal emphasized that assessments cannot be based on a time-barred notice, leading to the decision to annul the assessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:52:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 890 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122492</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, quashing the block assessment order due to the invalidity of the notice served beyond the prescribed period under section 143(2). The Tribunal emphasized that assessments cannot be based on a time-barred notice, leading to the decision to annul the assessment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>