<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 566 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122491</link>
    <description>The Settlement Commission, in a case involving M/s. Mesh Trans Gears (P) Limited under the Customs Act, 1962, asserted its jurisdiction and directed the applicant to pay the admitted amount within a specified period. Despite extensions granted for payment due to financial constraints, the applicant failed to comply with the directions, leading to concerns about non-compliance. The Commission noted the applicant&#039;s history of non-compliance, delays, and failure to attend hearings, ultimately deciding to send the case back to the customs officer for disposal as if no settlement application had been made, citing Section 127-I(1) of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:51:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 566 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122491</link>
      <description>The Settlement Commission, in a case involving M/s. Mesh Trans Gears (P) Limited under the Customs Act, 1962, asserted its jurisdiction and directed the applicant to pay the admitted amount within a specified period. Despite extensions granted for payment due to financial constraints, the applicant failed to comply with the directions, leading to concerns about non-compliance. The Commission noted the applicant&#039;s history of non-compliance, delays, and failure to attend hearings, ultimately deciding to send the case back to the customs officer for disposal as if no settlement application had been made, citing Section 127-I(1) of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>