<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 452 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122489</link>
    <description>Fabricated items made at site for erection of electricity lines were not liable to central excise duty because they were not intended for sale and were not shown to be marketable commodities known in trade. As excisability depends on manufacture, marketability and the character of goods, the items did not satisfy those requirements and were not dutiable. The amount deposited under protest was therefore refundable to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:49:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 452 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122489</link>
      <description>Fabricated items made at site for erection of electricity lines were not liable to central excise duty because they were not intended for sale and were not shown to be marketable commodities known in trade. As excisability depends on manufacture, marketability and the character of goods, the items did not satisfy those requirements and were not dutiable. The amount deposited under protest was therefore refundable to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>