<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 885 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122479</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the TDS provisions were not applicable to the notional entries reversed the next day, as they did not constitute actual credit or payment of interest. The lower authorities misunderstood the nature of the proforma entries, and the Tribunal found in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 885 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122479</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the TDS provisions were not applicable to the notional entries reversed the next day, as they did not constitute actual credit or payment of interest. The lower authorities misunderstood the nature of the proforma entries, and the Tribunal found in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>