<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 682 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122472</link>
    <description>The Settlement Commission for Customs and Central Excise settled the case initiated through a Show Cause Notice regarding excise duty payment on spare parts procured by a manufacturing company. The Applicant, engaged in trading activities, admitted to errors in availing Modvat credit on non-manufactured in the factory spare parts. Despite the Revenue&#039;s contentions, the Commission acknowledged the Applicant&#039;s efforts to rectify the situation, including implementing a system-generated report for accurate accounting. The case was settled under Section 32 F(7) of the Central Excise Act, with the duty liability fixed and immunity granted from interest, penalty, and prosecution, subject to specified conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:44:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 682 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122472</link>
      <description>The Settlement Commission for Customs and Central Excise settled the case initiated through a Show Cause Notice regarding excise duty payment on spare parts procured by a manufacturing company. The Applicant, engaged in trading activities, admitted to errors in availing Modvat credit on non-manufactured in the factory spare parts. Despite the Revenue&#039;s contentions, the Commission acknowledged the Applicant&#039;s efforts to rectify the situation, including implementing a system-generated report for accurate accounting. The case was settled under Section 32 F(7) of the Central Excise Act, with the duty liability fixed and immunity granted from interest, penalty, and prosecution, subject to specified conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>