<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 591 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122471</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that Mahabir Jute Mills Ltd. was the sole juridical entity, with no separate legal status for the yarn unit, thus overturning the prior determination of separate entities. It affirmed that Modvat credit for LDO used in electricity generation was admissible under CENVAT rules, as there was only one manufacturer and factory. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appellant to retain the Modvat credit initially claimed, and directed the return of the previously refunded cash amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2024 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 591 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122471</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that Mahabir Jute Mills Ltd. was the sole juridical entity, with no separate legal status for the yarn unit, thus overturning the prior determination of separate entities. It affirmed that Modvat credit for LDO used in electricity generation was admissible under CENVAT rules, as there was only one manufacturer and factory. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appellant to retain the Modvat credit initially claimed, and directed the return of the previously refunded cash amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>