https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122464 The judgment found in favor of the appellant, ruling that the goods, designated as promotional packs not for retail sale, should have been assessed under Section 4 of the Act instead of Section 4A. As a result, the demand was set aside, and the penalties imposed were deemed unsustainable. The impugned order was overturned, and the appeals were allowed. en-us Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:23:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122464 The judgment found in favor of the appellant, ruling that the goods, designated as promotional packs not for retail sale, should have been assessed under Section 4 of the Act instead of Section 4A. As a result, the demand was set aside, and the penalties imposed were deemed unsustainable. The impugned order was overturned, and the appeals were allowed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122464