<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 552 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122457</link>
    <description>Customs valuation requires acceptance of the declared transaction value where the price actually paid or payable is supported by a genuine contract, a letter of credit at the contracted rate, and no proven ground for rejection. Indicative international journal quotations do not, by themselves, establish a higher assessable value, and imports relied on for comparison must be truly comparable in quantity, timing and commercial circumstances. Where the importer&#039;s own contemporaneous transactions show lower prices for similar goods, and the goods are imported in large break-bulk quantities, price variation may be explained. Payment of duty under protest does not amount to acceptance of enhancement. The enhancement based on journal quotations and non-comparable imports was not sustainable, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:52:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 552 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122457</link>
      <description>Customs valuation requires acceptance of the declared transaction value where the price actually paid or payable is supported by a genuine contract, a letter of credit at the contracted rate, and no proven ground for rejection. Indicative international journal quotations do not, by themselves, establish a higher assessable value, and imports relied on for comparison must be truly comparable in quantity, timing and commercial circumstances. Where the importer&#039;s own contemporaneous transactions show lower prices for similar goods, and the goods are imported in large break-bulk quantities, price variation may be explained. Payment of duty under protest does not amount to acceptance of enhancement. The enhancement based on journal quotations and non-comparable imports was not sustainable, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>