<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 468 - CESTAT, new delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122450</link>
    <description>Charges for technical, engineering, design, supervision and related services are includible in the assessable value of imported goods under Rule 9(1)(e) only if payment for them is a condition of sale, or if the importer must discharge an obligation of the seller to a third party, and the amount is not already included in the price paid or payable. On the contract terms, the engineering, drawings, pretest, quality, supervision and erection charges were not shown to be a sale condition or a third-party obligation. The loading of value was therefore set aside and the inclusion of these service-related charges was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:26:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 468 - CESTAT, new delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122450</link>
      <description>Charges for technical, engineering, design, supervision and related services are includible in the assessable value of imported goods under Rule 9(1)(e) only if payment for them is a condition of sale, or if the importer must discharge an obligation of the seller to a third party, and the amount is not already included in the price paid or payable. On the contract terms, the engineering, drawings, pretest, quality, supervision and erection charges were not shown to be a sale condition or a third-party obligation. The loading of value was therefore set aside and the inclusion of these service-related charges was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>