<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 477 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122449</link>
    <description>The case involved disputes over the validity of deductions claimed for &quot;Interest on Receivables&quot; (I.O.R) by the applicant, sales made through an indenting agent, calculation of Central Excise duty, and immunity from penalties. The Commission denied the deduction for sales made through the agent, recalculated the duty payable, and required the applicant to pay an additional Central Excise duty of Rs. 3,12,771. However, the applicant was granted immunity from interest, penalty, and prosecution under the Central Excise Act, subject to no fraud or misrepresentation in the settlement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:24:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 477 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122449</link>
      <description>The case involved disputes over the validity of deductions claimed for &quot;Interest on Receivables&quot; (I.O.R) by the applicant, sales made through an indenting agent, calculation of Central Excise duty, and immunity from penalties. The Commission denied the deduction for sales made through the agent, recalculated the duty payable, and required the applicant to pay an additional Central Excise duty of Rs. 3,12,771. However, the applicant was granted immunity from interest, penalty, and prosecution under the Central Excise Act, subject to no fraud or misrepresentation in the settlement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>